Female Representation Research Articles

Does internationalization and board diversity affect family firms' sustainable performance? Empirical evidence from an emerging economy

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to examine the relation between internationalization and firm sustainable performance on a set of listed Indian family firms belonging to mid‐cap and large cap categories and listed on NIFTY 500. This paper aims to explore the heterogeneity among internationalization and a set of defined variables, namely, female representation on the board, firm size, firm age, industry type, leverage, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the number of female executives in influencing the firm performance. We aim to incorporate corporate governance, the factors influencing decisions related to it and gender diversity in understanding the relationship between internationalization and firm performance in the context of Indian family firms. The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and panel data regression models are both used in the study's empirical methodology. In order to examine the relationship between internationalization, as indicated by the percentage of foreign ownership, and family firm performance, as indicated by Return on Equity (ROE), the study uses the data from 2014 to 2023 for analysis, totaling 16,586 firm‐year observations. The findings indicate that internationalization, measured in this study by the investments the companies make abroad, positively affects the performance of the family firms. Age, women on board and number of female executives are seen to have positive associations with the performance of family firms. However, it is seen that firm size for family firms negatively impacts the performance while CSR and leverage seem to have no significant impact.

Institutional ownership and women representation on boards in three different institutional settings

AbstractThis study aims to investigate the moderating effect of country level institutional variables on the relationship between institutional ownership and board gender diversity. Using firm and country level data of three different cultural environments (Gulf Cooperation Council countries, UK, and France) for the years 2018–2019, this study concludes that institutional elements related to women (Women Tertiary education levels; legal support, Economic Participation and culture) create isomorphic pressure on firms that enhance the role of institutional owners in increasing women representation on board of directors. Other governance elements, such as ownership concentration, board independence and board size may indicate governance levels better than board gender diversity in certain institutional environments. The study recommended that board gender diversity should not be a priority for investors and portfolio managers in financial markets where reduced female labor market participation exists. Moreover, quotas may be a good tool for enhancing female representation among boards in contexts that have reduced female labor market participation and high levels of tertiary education attainment to maintain corporate sustainability.

Is a Simple Checklist Associated With Improvement in Gender Representation at the AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting?

In September 2017, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) added 2 questions querying panel organizers if gender/racial diversity was considered in selecting panel presenters, beginning with the 2018 Annual Meeting (AM). This study examines how this checklist impacted the gender diversity of panel presenters at the AAO-HNS AM. This was a cross-sectional investigation comparing female representation before and after the addition of questions inquiring about diversity in 2018. A review of abstract submissions for the AMs from 2015 to 2021. AM Official Program Abstracts were used to obtain presenter names and specialty area for each panel. The percentage of female presenters, in total and stratified by specialty area, were compared before and after 2018 to quantify changes following the addition of the checklist. There was a significant increase in the proportion of female panel presenters from 22.3% (total n = 1199) in 2015 to 2017 to 33.0% (total n = 1868) in 2018 to 2021 (P < .001) and in all panel specialties. The number of female moderated panels also significantly increased after checklist implementation from 22% to 38% (P < .001). Correspondingly, the number of panels with no female representation decreased from 42% in 2015 to 2017 to 23% in 2018 to 2021 (P < .001). The addition of a checklist asking panel organizers to consider diversity in selecting panelists was associated with an increased proportion of female presenters at the AM. This simple strategy can be implemented by all medical conferences to help close the gender gap.

Female leadership representation within otolaryngology specialty societies

ObjectivesDetermine if women have continued parity in leadership in otolaryngology specialty societies as compared to a paper by Choi and Miller in 2012. Additionally, we wanted insight into obstacles female leaders faced by surveying them directly to better understand their experiences with gender bias. MethodsChi-squared test evaluation was done using the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) 2020 membership data and directly from various otolaryngology specialty societies. An anonymous survey to assess different experiences of leaders in various Otolaryngology specialty societies was sent to current and past leaders of specialty societies via email. Survey data was assessed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistical analyses. Study Design: Cross-sectional study and survey study. ResultsFemale members comprised 19.3 % of practicing AAOHNS otolaryngologists. All societies had proportionate female leadership representation except for AAOA, which had greater representation. Compared to data from 10 years ago, female representation in all the societies' leadership has not changed significantly. Survey results demonstrated 64.9 % of respondents felt gender bias exists in Otolaryngology. 45.6 % of respondents personally experienced gender bias during their careers. Survey results showed males are less likely to experience gender bias. ConclusionThere is stability in the proportion of women in otolaryngology leadership positions compared to a decade ago largely due to efforts of leaders in the field. However, women leaders note experiencing gender bias and time away from clinical duties are prospective areas where support can be given. Level of evidence3.

Female representation on editorial boards of leading ophthalmology journals

PurposeTo assess the gender distribution of editorial board members of the leading ophthalmology journals according to SCImago Journal and Country Rank (SJR). MethodsTo evaluate the editorial boards of the ophthalmological journals in category Q1 of the SJR in a cross-sectional study. The primary outcome measured was the proportion of women as editor-in-chief and editorial board members. For the top 10 journals, the internal composition of the editorial board was analyzed and classified into four categories. The study was performed in Oftalmosalud Instituto de Ojos, Lima, Peru, from July to October 2022. In addition, the authors analyzed the women's participation in previous years as editorial board members. ResultsThirty-two ophthalmology journals were classified within the Q1 category. Female representation as editor-in-chief of Q1 ophthalmology journals was 14.63% (6/41) and as part of the editorial board was 32.9% (122/371). In the top 10 ophthalmology journals, none of the editors-in-chief (Category I) was a woman (p < .001); 11% (11/100) in category II (p < .001), 38.42% (88/229) in Category III (p < .001), and 32.25% (10/31) in category IV (p = 0.07) were women. There was no significant correlation between the percentage of female representation and the SJR (r = 0.32, p = 0.07). ConclusionWomen are underrepresented among editorial board members of the leading ophthalmological journals and this disparity is greater in senior positions. However, there has been an increase in participation through the years.

Gender Representation Among Foot &amp; Ankle Conference Presenters and Research Authors: A 10-Year Analysis (2012-2022)

Introduction/Purpose: Today women are over 50% of medical school matriculants but remain underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery (~15% of residents and &lt; 6% of practicing surgeons). Moreover, despite different and sometimes controversial reports, the rate of female society memberships and national and international meeting speakers as well as their contribution to leadership positions including moderating sessions, podiums, and symposiums are believed to be low. The objective of this study was to assess whether there is a gap in female representation among invited speakers at American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS) national meetings relative to research productivity as reflected by article authorship in Foot &amp; Ankle International journal (FAI). Methods: Programs for AOFAS specialty days and annual meetings and FAI articles from January 2012 to December 2022 were obtained. Industry-hosted programs were excluded. Gender was identified through personal acquaintance or online search on the biographies of the authors. Presentations and articles were categorized as “technical” or “non-technical”, where technical was defined as relating to basic science or the clinical practice of orthopaedics. Comparisons were done using the Chi-Square Test (significance level= p&lt; 0.05). Results: 1,020 AOFAS presentations and 2,230 FAI articles were analyzed. Gender was unavailable for 0.19% of AOFAS speakers, 4.48% of FAI first authors and 4.13% of FAI senior authors. 11.08% of AOFAS invited national meeting speakers, 15.18% of FAI first authors and 7.40% of FAI senior authors were female. Overall, the proportion of female speakers was significantly lower than female first authors (p= 0.0036), and significantly higher than female senior authors (p &lt; 0.001). In 2018 and 2019, women were more likely to have given “non-technical” AOFAS presentations. There was no significant difference in other years or among FAI articles. The average annual change was +2.00% female AOFAS presenters, +0.31% FAI female first authors and -0.37% FAI female senior authors per year. Conclusion: Women represented 15.16% of first authors in FAI between 2012 and 2022 but 11.08% of invited speakers at AOFAS meetings. Meanwhile, the percentage of female AOFAS membership in the organization as a whole increased from 7.5% to 13%. Thus, despite historically low rates of representation, female Foot &amp; Ankle surgeons were proportionally represented in 2021 and 2022 among invited national conference presentations and research compared to female society membership and female research publications in FAI. There is still room to increase representation of deserving historically under-represented groups, however the increase in female AOFAS presenters demonstrates a positive trend. Figure 1. Percentage of AOFAS Female Podium Speakers and FAI Female 1st Authors, 2012 - 2022

Auditing the Representation of Female Athletes in Sports Medicine Research: Fifth-Metatarsal Fractures.

Female representation within athletics has increased as a result of Title IX, rising popularity, demand for equal compensation, and greater participation in multiple sports. Despite this, gender disparities in sports medicine research are apparent. This project serves to review the literature available on fifth-metatarsal fractures and assess the representation of female athletes in current literature. We used a standardized protocol to audit the representation of female athletes in sports science and sports medicine research for fifth-metatarsal fractures. Primary factors included population, athletic caliber, menstrual status, research theme, sample of males and females, journal impact factor, and Altmetric score. Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 472 fifth-metatarsal fractures were identified, with 373 of 472 fractures (79%) occurring in males and 99 of 472 (21%) in females. The majority of studies (18/30, 60%) were mixed cohort, followed by 10 male only (33.33%), 1 female only (3.33%), and 1 male vs female (3.33%). Out of 831 total patients in the 18 mixed-cohort studies, 605 of 831 patients (72.8%) were male and 226 of 831 patients (27%) were female. All 18 mixed-sex cohorts investigated health outcomes. Male-only studies evaluated health outcomes and performance metrics. No studies investigated female performance. The one female-only study investigated health outcomes and was the only study to account for menstrual status. There was a single metatarsal fracture in this study population. Females are underrepresented in research regarding sports science and sports medicine research for fifth-metatarsal fractures. Research focused on female-only fifth-metatarsal fracture studies exploring the potential impact of female sex-specific factors such as menstrual status in study design are needed.

339 Gender Concordance and Publication Productivity Within Neurosurgical Focus: A Ten-Year Review

INTRODUCTION: The “glass ceiling” phenomenon describes how female representation in leadership positions has remained stagnant despite an increase in the number of trainees. Mentorship from female role models has been hypothesized to influence academic productivity. To our knowledge, trends in gender representation among editorial boards of neurosurgical journals remain undescribed. Neurosurgical Focus publishes monthly issues which are peer-reviewed by an invited group of topic editors based on their expertise in the field. METHODS: Publicly available data were collected from the Journal of Neurosurgery: Focus website from January 2013 to December 2022. Themes were dichotomized into technical or non-technical themes. Female gender concordant publications were defined as publications having females in both first and senior authorship. Gender was assessed using pronouns based on authors’ university profile and an artificial intelligence platform in case of ambiguity. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: The number of female editors and gender concordant authors increased over time (P &lt; 0.05). Women accounted for =50% of the editorial board on non-technical themes relevant to education and gender diversity. Having a female senior author was associated with higher publication productivity for original research and review articles among female authors (OR = 13.73, 95% CI = 1.74-394.31, P &lt; 0.05). The odds of having female gender concordant publications were higher with a female editor (OR = 4.05, 95% CI= 1.38-12.92, P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mentorship and representation among editorial boards play a crucial role in enhancing academic productivity among women. This paper provides evidence that Neurosurgical Focus increased female gender concordant publications by increasing female editors over time because of their efforts to increase female representation. Initiatives to increase female representation and mentorship will help overcome the glass ceiling phenomenon.

815 Gender Parity in Neurosurgery Residencies: An Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The number of women graduating from U.S. medical schools has reached parity with that of men. However, persistent inequalities and barriers have made the pace towards equity in application and representation in neurosurgery residency slow despite initiatives to increase female representation. METHODS: Data on the number of active female neurosurgery residents and female applicants to neurosurgery was collected from the American Council of Graduation Medical Education Data Resource Book from 2007 to 2021 and Electronic Residency Application Service from 2014 to 2022, respectively. Bivariate linear regression analysis was used to predict percent of active female residents based on academic year (AY). Pearson Chi-squared was conducted to determine the odds ratio of a female applicant to neurosurgery. RESULTS: The percent of active female residents in neurosurgery increased from 11.0% in 2007 to 21.8% in 2021. Bivariate linear regression analysis using AY as predictor of percent of active females was statistically significant. On average, the percent of active female residents increases by 0.65% per year. If trends persist, parity in neurosurgery will not be reached until 2069. Linear regression analysis of the overall rate of attrition in neurosurgery as a predictor of percent of active female residents revealed that for every 1% increase in rate of attrition the percent of active female residents decreases between 1.4% to 4.4%. The percent of female applicants to neurosurgery increased from 19.6% in 2014 to 29.8% in 2022, yet the odds of a female applying to neurosurgery remains low. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgery continues to struggle with recruitment of female medical students, despite achievement of parity for female medical school matriculants. Greater effort is needed to recruit and retain female applicants to neurosurgery, including increased transparency in match and attrition metrics.

Gender balance in Australian pharmacy organisations: Are we there yet?

IntroductionIn the dynamic landscape of healthcare, pharmacists play a critical role in ensuring the well-being of communities, and having solid professional organisations to support pharmacists is essential in crucial activities, including continuing education, advocacy and establishing service standards. Eight pharmacy organisations play vital roles in representing pharmacists in various sectors and collectively contribute to developing, regulating, and promoting the pharmacy profession in Australia. However, a notable lack of female representation in these organisations' leadership roles has led to an increased focus on gender balance and equity. ObjectiveTo determine if the gender distribution in pharmacy leadership aligns with the pharmacy workforce in Australia (64% women) and how it has changed in the five years since our last study on the issue. SettingAustralia. MethodEight key Australian pharmacy organisations were identified. The website for each organisation was accessed, and data were recorded for their 2023 boards/committees/councils based on annual reports. Data recorded include name, number of males, number of females, and the gender of the president/chair of each board/committee/council. ResultsData were obtained for 340 separate professional committee members from the eight organisations (including state/territory branches) in 2023. Gender balance in pharmacy organisations has increased significantly since 2018, with women's representation in leadership positions now at 58% (47% 2018). ConclusionGender equity within Australian pharmacy professional organisations has significantly progressed.

Favorable prognosis in posterior circulation ischemic stroke: Insights from a nationwide stroke databank

IntroductionClinical trials have historically underrepresented patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS). This study aimed to comprehensively assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of PCIS patients compared to those with anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACIS). MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japan Stroke Data Bank, encompassing 20 years across 130 stroke centers. The study focused on patients diagnosed with PCIS or ACIS. ResultsAmong 37,069 patients reviewed, 7425 had PCIS, whereas 29,644 had ACIS. PCIS patients were younger and had a lower female representation than ACIS patients. Notably, PCIS patients had more favorable outcomes: 71% achieved a modified Rankin Scale of 0–2 or showed no deterioration at discharge (17 days at the median after admission), compared to 60% for ACIS patients (p < 0.001). Factors associated with an unfavorable outcome in the PCIS subgroup were older age, female sex (assigned at birth), history of hypertension, and higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission. In both sexes, older age and higher NIHSS scores were negatively associated with favorable outcomes. ConclusionsPCIS patients demonstrated a more favorable prognosis than ACIS patients. Factors like older age, female sex, and higher NIHSS scores at admission were identified as independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes in PCIS patients. Older age and higher NIHSS scores at admission were common independent negative factors for a favorable outcome regardless of sex.

Analyzing gender equality in the US and Indonesian parliaments through liberal feminism theory

Gender inequality is a persistent issue experienced by women worldwide, often intertwined with their limited participation in political spheres. This study examines the political involvement of women in the parliaments of Indonesia and the United States of America (USA) through the lens of liberal feminism theory. Employing qualitative decryption approaches with a comparative study design, data collected from both the Indonesian Parliament and the USA Parliament were understood, recorded, phrased, compared and analyzed within the framework of liberal feminism theory, focusing on the "Right in Public Life and Politics". The results of the study revealed that while the Government of Indonesia has enacted legislation mandating a minimum of 30% female representation in political parties, both the Indonesian and US parliaments exhibit disproportionately low levels of female members compared to their male counterparts. A notable distinction between the two lies in the parliamentary leadership, with Indonesia being led by a woman and the USA by men. To enhance women's political participation, it is imperative for both governments to rigorously enforce regulations and sanctions against political parties. Additionally, efforts to dismantle the prevailing masculine culture in various societies are crucial in order to foster gender equality and justice, thereby realizing gender democracy.

Examining the coach–athlete relationship for facilitators and barriers to healthy sport participation for cyclically menstruating athletes: A systematic review

Menstrual function is an integral component of the overall health and well-being of cyclically menstruating athletes, impacted by and affecting their participation in sport and athletic training. This review used the coach–athlete relationship to examine the sport environment for factors that facilitate or hinder healthy sport participation for cyclically menstruating athletes with respect to their menstrual cycles. Four databases were searched until June 30, 2023, for studies that explored the experiences, perceptions and knowledge related to the menstrual cycle among athletes training under a coach and coaches of cyclically menstruating athletes. The search produced 2511 studies, which, following screening for relevance and eligibility, resulted in 34 studies of moderate-to-high quality. Thematic synthesis and integration of qualitative and quantitative data from 7558 athletes and coaches from elite to amateur level uncovered 4 main themes pertaining to the coach–athlete relationship and the menstrual cycle that constituted barriers (menstruation taboo, lack of knowledge and awareness, and lack of communication among stakeholders) and facilitators (presence of female coaches, positive experiences of communicating about the menstrual cycle, and trust) to healthy sport participation. A final theme summarised the needs of athletes and coaches related to the menstrual cycle. Greater education, representation of females in sporting roles, and improved collaboration among the various stakeholders emerged as the primary factors for driving a culture-shift in the sporting environment, in order to abolish the taboo against menstruation and promote healthy sport participation for cyclically menstruating athletes.

Gender inequality in genitourinary malignancies clinical trials leadership.

Over the past 2 decades, there has been a growing interest in the significance of gender roles in healthcare and several efforts and initiatives have focused on increasing female representation in the medical field. Clinical trials play a very important role in shaping medical practice; moreover, the leaders of clinical trials often represent the upper echelon of researchers in any designated field. Presently, there is no data regarding women's representation in urological oncology clinical trials leadership. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the extent of female representation in leading urological clinical trials. To thoroughly examine the representation of females as principal investigators (PIs) in urological cancer clinical trials between 2000 and 2020, we conducted a comprehensive search of completed trials focused on kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer on ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted relevant information regarding the PIs and analyzed the data using univariate analyses to identify any significant differences between male and female PIs. A total of 9145 cancer clinical trials were conducted over the last 2 decades, and 11.3% (n = 1033) of them were urological cancer clinical trials. We were able to obtain detailed information about the principal investigators (PI) in 79.0% (n = 816) of the clinical trials, and we found that 16.8% (n = 137) of them were led by female investigators. Upon evaluating the characteristics of the PIs, female PIs had a significantly lower median age and median total citations as compared to male PIs (55.0 vs 59.0 and 5333 vs 7902; p-value < 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the termination rate, publication rate, funding source, cancer type, and the subject of conducting the clinical trials between male and female PIs. Between 2000 and 2020, only 16.8% of urological cancer clinical trials were led by a female PI, perhaps reflective of a low percentage of senior female researchers in the fields of urology, oncology and radiation oncology. Universities, research institutes and funding agencies should work to improve mentorship, representation and opportunities for female investigators to encourage more involvement for female researchers in these clinical trials.

Advocating for Disability Voting Rights in Framework Ius Constituendum

Protecting and guaranteeing the rights of every citizen is the obligation of the state, but in fact there are still acts of discrimination in the rights of citizens experienced by persons with disabilities. One form of discrimination carried out is related to political rights by setting physical health requirements for prospective members of the DPR, provincial DPRD, and district/city DPRD. Although there is no definite limit to measure the level of physical health. In addition, the electoral law contradicts the law on persons with disabilities which states that persons with disabilities have political rights. The electoral law should provide an open space as a means for people with disabilities to become part of public office.  However, this will not be realized without a special quota for persons with disabilities to run as candidates for legislative members, as is the case with the quota of 30% female representation as prospective candidates for the DPR / DPRD and the determination of persons with disabilities as workers in government agencies at least 2% and 1% for private companies. Therefore, regulations should be added related to special quotas for persons with disabilities to become candidates for representation from political parties as election participants

Female (Mis)representation in Moroccan Male-Authored Postcolonial Literature: The Madwoman Trope in Mohamed Mrabet’s The Big Mirror

ABSTRACT Through a feminist postcolonial theoretical lens, this article puts forth a new reading of Mohamed Mrabet’s novella The Big Mirror. Written by a male Moroccan writer in 1977, a short while after Morocco’s emergence from colonial rule, The Big Mirror has yet to be read and scrutinized from a gender-critical perspective. Given that post-independence is a period so critical for the development of gender relations in Morocco, literary works featuring female characters as central figures to the plot and the themes present an opportunity to extract knowledge about female representation and agency in that particular context. This article argues that The Big Mirror, like many other narrative texts written in this period, fails to represent the female character in an unideological and gender-neutral way. Through the use of the Spivakian theory of the subaltern and the impossibility of her representation, this article argues that by claiming to speak for the female character, this narrative effectively silences her and effaces her agency. As a result, the female character becomes strongly inscribed in a masculinist discourse that capitalizes on the literary trope of the madwoman as a means to further occlude female agency rather than promoting it.

Breaking gender stereotypes in management practices: Promoting paternity leave

AbstractThis study examines the promotion of paternity leave by focusing on the role of female directors on boards. Drawing on insights from the literature on the upper echelons theory and strategic leadership, we argue that efforts to break gender stereotypes in upper‐echelon positions, particularly through female representation on boards, can promote paternity leave. Analyzing data from 633 Japanese firms between 2017 and 2021 with pooled regression models revealed that a high proportion of female directors promoted paternity leave. Additionally, it implied that the proportion of female department managers can strengthen the positive effects of female directors on paternity leave promotions. Our results contribute to the theory and practice of gender equality in organizations by providing implications for promoting crucial management practices that may be hindered by gender stereotypes.

The ripple effect of all-star females: Knowledge spillover and improved analyst performance

This paper studies whether all-star females’ representation in brokerages leads to positive outcomes. I find that an increase in the number of all-star females in a brokerage spurs the future performance of other analysts in that brokerage. Knowledge spillover is an economic channel that explains this effect, as analysts who cover firms in the same industry as all-star females experience a larger boost in their outcomes. A higher representation of all-star females in a brokerage further improves the timeliness of other analysts’ forecasts. Overall, the results suggest that all-star female analysts have a positive effect on the outcome of their workplace.

Female Board Representation and Corporate Performance: A Review and New Estimates for Australia1

Despite a conventional wisdom that female board members positively impact firm performance, a thorough examination of the research to date reveals no consensus that female board members have either a positive or negative effect on firm financial performance. We build the largest dataset of Australian board appointments assembled to date. We use our data to demonstrate how difficult it is to replicate existing research, with one example from Australia and one from the USA. Using event studies and regression analyses, we demonstrate that there is little evidence that female board representation affects firm financial performance.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. It remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and portends worse outcomes in women than men. Disparities exist in every stage of science, from bench research to the editorial board of major journals and in every cardiovascular subspecialty. This review summarizes differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disparities in management and outcomes of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and atrial fibrillation. It also provides an overview of female representation as participants and leaders of clinical trials, editorial boards, and academic institutions. Strategies to overcome these disparities are proposed with examples of successful programs.